Brinkworth v Welsh Ministers & Anor
The claimant failed to establish any legal error, material misidentification, or perversity in the inspector's decision. The inspector exercised proper planning judgment, considered all relevant factors, and applied the correct policy. The application under section 288 must be refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tony Brinkworth; First Defendant: Welsh Ministers; Second Defendant: Neath Port Talbot Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / Judgment on Application Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Statutory Interpretation, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tony Brinkworth
Claimant
Welsh Ministers
First Defendant
Neath Port Talbot Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / Judgment on Application Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector mis-identified the appeal site
- 2 Whether the inspector's findings on the character and appearance of the site were perverse or materially erroneous
- 3 Whether the inspector failed to consider relevant material or took into account irrelevant material
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to establish any legal error, material misidentification, or perversity in the inspector's decision. The inspector exercised proper planning judgment, considered all relevant factors, and applied the correct policy. The application under section 288 must be refused.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application under section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 refused
- Claimant to pay first defendant's costs, summarily assessed at £5028
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment