Cubitt -Smith v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
The Inspector's decision was a lawful exercise of planning judgment, not irrational or vitiated by mistake of fact or unfairness. The court cannot substitute its own view for that of the decision maker.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jennifer Jane Cubitt-Smith; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: London Borough of Wandsworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Mistake of Fact, Planning Judgment, Weight of Considerations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jennifer Jane Cubitt-Smith
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
London Borough of Wandsworth
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector's decision regarding the front dormer was irrational
- 2 Whether the Inspector made a mistake of fact regarding objections to the rear extension
- 3 Whether there was unfairness arising from a mistake of fact
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector's decision was a lawful exercise of planning judgment, not irrational or vitiated by mistake of fact or unfairness. The court cannot substitute its own view for that of the decision maker.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's application to quash the Inspector's decision is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment