Golding, R (on the application of) v General Commissioners of Income Tax & Anor
There was no evidence of bias or unfairness in the conduct of the General Commissioners. The reasons for refusing to close the enquiry were valid and justified. The application for judicial review is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Queen on the application of Golding; Defendants: General Commissioners of Income Tax; Interested Party: Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Tax Decisions, Bias and Fair Hearing, Costs Orders, Joinder of Non Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the application of Golding
Claimant
General Commissioners of Income Tax
Defendants
Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Commissioners of Income Tax conducted a fair hearing and/or were biased in refusing to close the tax enquiry into Mr Golding
- 2 Whether the refusal to close the enquiry was justified
- 3 Whether Dr Milton should be joined for a potential costs order
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence of bias or unfairness in the conduct of the General Commissioners. The reasons for refusing to close the enquiry were valid and justified. The application for judicial review is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Claim for judicial review dismissed
- Order for costs in favour of the Defendants on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment