Fawdrey & Co (A Firm) v Murfitt [2001] EWCA Civ 1677 (2 November 2001)
Permission to appeal is granted on the jurisdictional point regarding the judge's power to deal with the case, as the circumstances raise significant legal and factual issues about the validity of the transfer and the judge's authority.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1677
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Fawdry & Co (a Firm); Defendant/respondent: Colin Douglas Murfitt; Intervener (potential): Lord Chancellor's Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on jurisdictional point.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Case Transfer, Judicial Authority
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fawdry & Co (a Firm)
Claimant/applicant
Colin Douglas Murfitt
Defendant/respondent
Lord Chancellor's Department
Intervener (potential)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Her Honour Judge Davies had jurisdiction to try the case after transfer to the Technology and Construction Court
- 2 Whether the transfer of the case was valid and effective
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the jurisdictional point regarding the judge's power to deal with the case, as the circumstances raise significant legal and factual issues about the validity of the transfer and the judge's authority.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on jurisdictional point.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted only on jurisdictional point in relation to judge's power to deal with case.
- Lord Chancellor's Department to have permission to intervene if so advised.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment