Chechetkin v Payward Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 3057 (Ch) (25 October 2022)
The claimant is a consumer under section 15E CJJA; the arbitration clause and award do not deprive the English court of jurisdiction; section 101 Arbitration Act does not remove jurisdiction; the application to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction fails.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 3057 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Chechetkin; Defendants: Payward Ltd & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Jurisdiction Application Under Part 11 CPR / Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Arbitration Clause, Consumer Contract, Enforcement of Arbitration Awards
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chechetkin
Claimant
Payward Ltd & Ors
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Jurisdiction Application Under Part 11 CPR / Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over the claimant's claim in light of an arbitration clause and New York Convention award
- 2 Whether the claimant is a consumer under section 15E Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
- 3 Effect of section 101 Arbitration Act 1996 on court's jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is a consumer under section 15E CJJA; the arbitration clause and award do not deprive the English court of jurisdiction; section 101 Arbitration Act does not remove jurisdiction; the application to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction fails.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Jurisdiction application dismissed
- Relief from sanctions granted for late service of witness statement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment