Moloobhoy & Anor v Kanani
The appeal was dismissed because the defendant did not require further time to decide whether to submit to the jurisdiction, had already accepted the obligation to account, and there was no conceivable defence to the claim. The court was entitled to proceed to summary judgment given the directions already made and the evidence before it.
- Parties
- Appellants/claimants: Moloobhoy & Anr; Respondent/defendant: Kanani
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in the Commercial Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Summary Judgment, Partnerships, Forum Non Conveniens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moloobhoy & Anr
Appellants/claimants
Kanani
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in the Commercial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court was correct to proceed to summary judgment before allowing the defendant to file a further acknowledgment of service and defence after a failed jurisdiction challenge under CPR 11.
- 2 Whether the case was sufficiently 'rare' to justify immediate determination of the summary judgment application.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the defendant did not require further time to decide whether to submit to the jurisdiction, had already accepted the obligation to account, and there was no conceivable defence to the claim. The court was entitled to proceed to summary judgment given the directions already made and the evidence before it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; summary judgment for the claimants stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment