Enasarco v Lehman Brothers Finance SA & Anor
The Swiss proceedings are insolvency proceedings excluded from the Lugano Convention under article 1(2)(b); therefore, article 27 does not apply and the English proceedings should not be stayed. The exclusive jurisdiction clause and governing law favour resolution in England. There are no substantial grounds for a discretionary stay under article 28 or section 49(3) SCA 1981. ARIC is granted permission to bring a Part 20 claim against LBF.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fondazione Enasarco; First Defendant: Lehman Brothers Finance S. A.; Second Defendant: Anthracite Rated Investments (Cayman) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Ruling on Applications for Stay and Permission to Bring Part 20 Claim
- Outcome
- Application for stay by LBF refused; permission granted to ARIC to bring Part 20 claim.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Stay of Proceedings, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Cross Border Insolvency, Lugano Convention, Proof of Debt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fondazione Enasarco
Claimant
Lehman Brothers Finance S. A.
First Defendant
Anthracite Rated Investments (Cayman) Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Ruling on Applications for Stay and Permission to Bring Part 20 Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Swiss proceedings fall within the exclusion of insolvency proceedings under article 1(2)(b) of the Lugano Convention
- 2 Whether the English court is required to stay proceedings under article 27 of the Lugano Convention
- 3 Whether article 28 of the Lugano Convention applies to related actions
Ratio Decidendi
The Swiss proceedings are insolvency proceedings excluded from the Lugano Convention under article 1(2)(b); therefore, article 27 does not apply and the English proceedings should not be stayed. The exclusive jurisdiction clause and governing law favour resolution in England. There are no substantial grounds for a discretionary stay under article 28 or section 49(3) SCA 1981. ARIC is granted permission to bring a Part 20 claim against LBF.
Court Disposition
Application for stay by LBF refused; permission granted to ARIC to bring Part 20 claim.
Orders
- Refusal of stay of English proceedings under Lugano Convention and SCA 1981.
- Permission granted to ARIC to commence Part 20 claim against LBF.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment