Dennis v Tag Group Ltd & Ors

Dennis v Tag Group Ltd & Ors

TAG Group Limited and Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C, by their conduct in the injunction proceedings—including seeking and receiving documents, providing undertakings, filing witness statements on the merits, and failing to make a clear and express reservation of jurisdiction—unequivocally submitted to the jurisdiction of the English Court or waived their right to contest jurisdiction. In the alternative, Article 24 of the Recast Brussels Regulation applies, and permission to serve out was not required.

Parties
Petitioner: Ronald Dennis; First Respondent: TAG Group Limited; Second Respondent: Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C; Third Respondent: McLaren Technology Group Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Company Law Petition (unfair Prejudice) and Injunction Application / Ruling on Submission to Jurisdiction and Service of Petition
Outcome
Application granted; TAG Group Limited and Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C are treated as having submitted to the jurisdiction and service of the petition is effective.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Submission to Jurisdiction, Service of Process, Unfair Prejudice, Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Dennis

Petitioner

TAG Group Limited

First Respondent

Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C

Second Respondent

McLaren Technology Group Limited

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Company Law Petition (unfair Prejudice) and Injunction Application / Ruling on Submission to Jurisdiction and Service of Petition

  1. 1 Whether TAG Group Limited and Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C submitted to the jurisdiction of the English Court by their conduct in resisting an injunction application
  2. 2 Whether service of the unfair prejudice petition was properly effected on the First and Second Respondents

Ratio Decidendi

TAG Group Limited and Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C, by their conduct in the injunction proceedings—including seeking and receiving documents, providing undertakings, filing witness statements on the merits, and failing to make a clear and express reservation of jurisdiction—unequivocally submitted to the jurisdiction of the English Court or waived their right to contest jurisdiction. In the alternative, Article 24 of the Recast Brussels Regulation applies, and permission to serve out was not required.

Court Disposition

Application granted; TAG Group Limited and Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C are treated as having submitted to the jurisdiction and service of the petition is effective.

Orders

  • TAG Group Limited and Bahrain Mumtalakat Holding Company B.S.C are deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the English Court.
  • Service of the unfair prejudice petition on the First and Second Respondents is effective.