Sanjay Shah & Anor v Christopher Chipperton
The Defendant failed to discharge the burden of showing that Dubai is clearly or distinctly the more appropriate forum. There is an implied choice of English law as the governing law of the alleged trust, and the dispute has its closest connection with England. The application to set aside or stay the claim on forum non conveniens grounds is dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Sanjay Shah; Claimant/respondent: Elysium Global (Dubai) Limited; Defendant/applicant: Christopher Chipperton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Jurisdiction Challenge / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Claim for Lack of Jurisdiction/forum Non Conveniens
- Outcome
- Defendant's application to set aside or stay the claim dismissed; costs awarded to Claimants; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, Governing Law of Trusts, Recognition of Trusts, Parallel Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sanjay Shah
Claimant/respondent
Elysium Global (Dubai) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Christopher Chipperton
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Jurisdiction Challenge / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Claim for Lack of Jurisdiction/forum Non Conveniens
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should decline jurisdiction on forum non conveniens grounds in favour of Dubai
- 2 What is the governing law of the alleged trust at the heart of the dispute
- 3 Whether there is an implied choice of English law under the Hague Trusts Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant failed to discharge the burden of showing that Dubai is clearly or distinctly the more appropriate forum. There is an implied choice of English law as the governing law of the alleged trust, and the dispute has its closest connection with England. The application to set aside or stay the claim on forum non conveniens grounds is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Defendant's application to set aside or stay the claim dismissed; costs awarded to Claimants; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application to set aside or stay the claim on forum non conveniens grounds is dismissed.
- Defendant to pay Claimants' costs in the sum of £50,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment