Global Multimedia International Ltd v ARA Media Services & Anor [2006] EWHC 3612 (Ch) (21 July 2006)
Mr. Aljadail, by his conduct and that of his solicitors, objectively submitted to the jurisdiction of the English court before seeking to challenge it; England is the appropriate forum for the Part 20 claim given the connections of the parties and risk of conflicting judgments; the application to set aside service and stay proceedings is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 3612 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/part 20 Defendant: Global Multimedia International Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: ARA Media Services; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Middle East Broadcasting Centre; Part 20 Defendant (applicant): Assad Abu Aljadail; Part 20 Defendant: Mamdouh Abougabal; Part 20 Defendant: Hamdi Al Serafi; Part 20 Defendant: Mazen Makki; Part 20 Defendant: Antoine Elias Khoury; Part 20 Defendant: Global Media (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim With Part 20 Proceedings / Application to Contest Jurisdiction and Set Aside Service Orders
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Challenge, Submission to Jurisdiction, Forum Conveniens, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Release and Settlement Agreements, Pleading Foreign Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Global Multimedia International Limited
Claimant/part 20 Defendant
ARA Media Services
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Middle East Broadcasting Centre
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Assad Abu Aljadail
Part 20 Defendant (applicant)
Mamdouh Abougabal
Part 20 Defendant
Hamdi Al Serafi
Part 20 Defendant
Mazen Makki
Part 20 Defendant
Antoine Elias Khoury
Part 20 Defendant
Global Media (UK) Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim With Part 20 Proceedings / Application to Contest Jurisdiction and Set Aside Service Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Aljadail submitted to the jurisdiction of the English court
- 2 Whether England or Saudi Arabia is the appropriate forum for the Part 20 claim
- 3 Whether service orders should be set aside
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Aljadail, by his conduct and that of his solicitors, objectively submitted to the jurisdiction of the English court before seeking to challenge it; England is the appropriate forum for the Part 20 claim given the connections of the parties and risk of conflicting judgments; the application to set aside service and stay proceedings is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application of Mr. Aljadail to contest jurisdiction and set aside service is dismissed
- Mr. Aljadail to pay £80,000 on account of costs within 28 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment