Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.P.A. & Ors
The exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Warranties Agreement applies to all disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement, including substantive warranty claims. Subrogated insurers are bound by the clause to the same extent as the insured. The English court has jurisdiction to determine Airbus’s claims, and there is a good arguable case that the Italian proceedings are contrary to the jurisdiction clause.
- Parties
- Respondent (claimant): Airbus S. A. S.; Appellant (defendant): Generali Italia S.p. A.; Appellant (defendant): AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance; Appellant (defendant): Allianz Global Corporate & Speciality SE Representation for Italy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part; judge’s construction of jurisdiction clause upheld; final declaration granted on jurisdiction clause; final declarations on breach of clause by Italian proceedings set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Clauses, Subrogation, Arbitration Vs Litigation, Equitable Obligations, Exclusive Jurisdiction, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Airbus S. A. S.
Respondent (claimant)
Generali Italia S.p. A.
Appellant (defendant)
AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance
Appellant (defendant)
Allianz Global Corporate & Speciality SE Representation for Italy
Appellant (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the English court have jurisdiction under the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Warranties Agreement?
- 2 Does the jurisdiction clause extend to substantive warranty claims?
- 3 Are the Italian proceedings contrary to the jurisdiction clause?
Ratio Decidendi
The exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Warranties Agreement applies to all disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement, including substantive warranty claims. Subrogated insurers are bound by the clause to the same extent as the insured. The English court has jurisdiction to determine Airbus’s claims, and there is a good arguable case that the Italian proceedings are contrary to the jurisdiction clause.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part; judge’s construction of jurisdiction clause upheld; final declaration granted on jurisdiction clause; final declarations on breach of clause by Italian proceedings set aside.
Orders
- Final declaration that clause 13.2 of the Warranties Agreement applies to all disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement, including substantive warranty claims.
- Judge’s grant of final declarations that Italian proceedings fall within the scope of the jurisdiction clause and their commencement was a breach of that clause set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment