Fowler De Pledge (a firm) v Smith
The Court of Appeal held that Judge Brandt's order was a first-tier appeal and that Judge Thompson erred by failing to make explicit findings as to Mr Smith's means before ordering him to pay the full costs. The order was unreasonable under section 17 of the Legal Aid Act 1988 and could not stand.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Fowler De Pledge (a firm); Defendant/appellant: Geoffrey Paul Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court and High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Appeal Courts, Costs Orders Against Legally Assisted Parties, Interpretation of Section 17 Legal Aid Act 1988
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fowler De Pledge (a firm)
Claimant/respondent
Geoffrey Paul Smith
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court and High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of Judge Brandt constituted a first-tier or second-tier appeal for jurisdictional purposes
- 2 Whether Judge Thompson erred in ordering the defendant to pay the full costs under section 17 of the Legal Aid Act 1988
- 3 Proper approach to assessment of costs liability for legally assisted parties
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that Judge Brandt's order was a first-tier appeal and that Judge Thompson erred by failing to make explicit findings as to Mr Smith's means before ordering him to pay the full costs. The order was unreasonable under section 17 of the Legal Aid Act 1988 and could not stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Garland J set aside
- Order of Judge Thompson set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment