L. M. Associates Ltd v Gibbeson
An order of the High Court refusing permission to appeal and precluding an oral renewal hearing under CPR 52.4(3) when the application is certified as totally without merit is not separately appealable to the Court of Appeal. Section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 bars any such appeal, as the order is an...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant and Respondent: L. M. Associates Limited; 3rd Defendant and Appellant: William Gibbeson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (pta) to the Court of Appeal From a High Court Order Refusing PTA and Certifying the Application as Totally Without Merit (twm)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal, Permission to Appeal, Totally Without Merit Certification, Civil Procedure Rules, Access to Justice Act 1999
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L. M. Associates Limited
Claimant and Respondent
William Gibbeson
3rd Defendant and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (pta) to the Court of Appeal From a High Court Order Refusing PTA and Certifying the Application as Totally Without Merit (twm)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a High Court order refusing permission to appeal and precluding an oral renewal hearing under CPR 52.4(3) when the application is certified as totally without merit (TWM)
Ratio Decidendi
An order of the High Court refusing permission to appeal and precluding an oral renewal hearing under CPR 52.4(3) when the application is certified as totally without merit is not separately appealable to the Court of Appeal. Section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 bars any such appeal, as the order is an integral part of the refusal of PTA and not a freestanding order.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is dismissed.
- Permission is granted for this judgment to be cited pursuant to Practice Direction (Citation of Authorities) [2001] 1 WLR 1001 (CA).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment