YA(F) and A Local Authority & Ors [2010] EWCOP 2770 (02 September 2010)
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear and grant remedies for Human Rights Act claims brought by both P and family members where acts are done in relation to P, including declaratory relief and damages, because its powers under s.47(1) Mental Capacity Act 2005 are equivalent to those of the High Court, which can award damages under the HRA. The application to strike out the mother's claim is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCOP 2770
- Parties
- Claimant: YA(F) (the mother); First Defendant: A Local Authority; Second Defendant: YA(M) (the son); Third Defendant: A NHS Trust; Fourth Defendant: A Primary Care Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Application / Jurisdictional Challenge and Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Application to strike out the mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed; Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear both claims and award damages.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court of Protection, Human Rights Act 1998, Damages Under HRA, Article 8 ECHR, Article 5 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR, Declaratory Relief, Best Interests, Family Relationships
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YA(F) (the mother)
Claimant
A Local Authority
First Defendant
YA(M) (the son)
Second Defendant
A NHS Trust
Third Defendant
A Primary Care Trust
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Jurisdictional Challenge and Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court of Protection have jurisdiction to hear and grant remedies for Human Rights Act claims brought by family members (the mother) as well as by P (the son)?
- 2 Does the Court of Protection have jurisdiction to award damages under the Human Rights Act 1998?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear and grant remedies for Human Rights Act claims brought by both P and family members where acts are done in relation to P, including declaratory relief and damages, because its powers under s.47(1) Mental Capacity Act 2005 are equivalent to those of the High Court, which can award damages under the HRA. The application to strike out the mother's claim is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out the mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed; Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear both claims and award damages.
Orders
- Application to strike out the mother's claim dismissed.
- No transfer of son's damages claim required; both claims to proceed in Court of Protection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment