YA(F) v A Local Authority [2010] EWHC 2770 (Fam) (02 September 2010)
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to consider and grant remedies for Human Rights Act claims brought by both P and family members, including declaratory relief and damages, as its powers under section 47(1) Mental Capacity Act 2005 are equivalent to those of the High Court and encompass the ability to award damages under the Human Rights Act.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 2770 (Fam)
- Parties
- Claimant: YA(F); First Defendant: A Local Authority; Second Defendant: YA(M); Third Defendant: A NHS Trust; Fourth Defendant: A Primary Care Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Proceedings / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Application to strike out the mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed; Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear and grant remedies for both mother and son, including damages.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court of Protection, Human Rights Act 1998, Damages Under Human Rights Act, Declaratory Relief, Article 8 ECHR, Article 5 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YA(F)
Claimant
A Local Authority
First Defendant
YA(M)
Second Defendant
A NHS Trust
Third Defendant
A Primary Care Trust
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Proceedings / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court of Protection have jurisdiction to hear and grant remedies for Human Rights Act claims brought by family members (the mother) as well as by P (the son)?
- 2 Does the Court of Protection have jurisdiction to award damages under the Human Rights Act 1998?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to consider and grant remedies for Human Rights Act claims brought by both P and family members, including declaratory relief and damages, as its powers under section 47(1) Mental Capacity Act 2005 are equivalent to those of the High Court and encompass the ability to award damages under the Human Rights Act.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out the mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed; Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear and grant remedies for both mother and son, including damages.
Orders
- Application to strike out the mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed.
- Court of Protection to treat as before it the Queen's Bench Division proceedings for both mother's and son's Human Rights Act damages claims at the next hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment