Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd v KS & Ors [2025] EWCOP 7 (T2) (20 February 2025)
The Court of Protection retains jurisdiction over KS's property and affairs in England, and the deputyship appointment stands, because Article 14 of Hague 34 provides for the continuation of protective measures after a change of habitual residence to a non-Contracting State, and the Court of Protection had jurisdiction at the time of the deputy's appointment. This jurisdiction continues unless and until the new state of habitual residence modifies or replaces the measure.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCOP 7
- Parties
- Deputy/applicant: Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd; Protected Person/first Respondent: KS; Sibling of Ks/second Respondent: Second Respondent; Sibling of Ks/third Respondent: Third Respondent; Father of KS: RuS; Mother of KS: RaS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Property and Affairs Application / Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Court of Protection retains jurisdiction; deputyship continues.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court of Protection, Habitual Residence, Deputyship for Minors, International Protection of Children, Recognition of Foreign Guardianship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd
Deputy/applicant
KS
Protected Person/first Respondent
Second Respondent
Sibling of Ks/second Respondent
Third Respondent
Sibling of Ks/third Respondent
RuS
Father of KS
RaS
Mother of KS
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Property and Affairs Application / Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court of Protection retain jurisdiction over the property and affairs of a minor under 16 who is now habitually resident outside England and Wales?
- 2 Does the deputyship appointment continue after the change of habitual residence to India?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Protection retains jurisdiction over KS's property and affairs in England, and the deputyship appointment stands, because Article 14 of Hague 34 provides for the continuation of protective measures after a change of habitual residence to a non-Contracting State, and the Court of Protection had jurisdiction at the time of the deputy's appointment. This jurisdiction continues unless and until the new state of habitual residence modifies or replaces the measure.
Court Disposition
Court of Protection retains jurisdiction; deputyship continues.
Orders
- Deputy's appointment stands.
- Parties to agree further directions and submit a COP9 application with draft order within 28 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment