YA(F) v A Local Authority
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear Human Rights Act claims brought by both P and family members regarding acts done in relation to P, and has power to award damages under the Human Rights Act by virtue of s.47(1) Mental Capacity Act conferring High Court powers.
- Parties
- Claimant: YA(F); First Defendant: A Local Authority; Second Defendant: YA(M); Third Defendant: A NHS Trust; Fourth Defendant: A Primary Care Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Act Claim in Court of Protection / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Costs
- Outcome
- Application to strike out mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed; Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear claims and award damages.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court of Protection, Convention Rights, Declaratory Relief, Damages Under Human Rights Act, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YA(F)
Claimant
A Local Authority
First Defendant
YA(M)
Second Defendant
A NHS Trust
Third Defendant
A Primary Care Trust
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Act Claim in Court of Protection / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court of Protection have jurisdiction to hear Human Rights Act claims by family members?
- 2 Can the Court of Protection award damages under the Human Rights Act?
- 3 Should the mother's Human Rights Act claim be struck out for lack of jurisdiction?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear Human Rights Act claims brought by both P and family members regarding acts done in relation to P, and has power to award damages under the Human Rights Act by virtue of s.47(1) Mental Capacity Act conferring High Court powers.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out mother's Human Rights Act claim dismissed; Court of Protection has jurisdiction to hear claims and award damages.
Orders
- Local Authority and NHS Trust to pay one half of the Claimant's costs incurred by the strike out application; other half reserved.
- Son's costs of and in respect of the strike out application reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment