Mereworth v Ministry of Justice
The court has no jurisdiction to determine entitlement to a Writ of Summons for the House of Lords, as this falls within the exclusive cognisance of Parliament. Even if jurisdiction existed, section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords, and the claim would fail on its merits.
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Baron Mereworth; Respondent/defendant: Ministry of Justice (Crown Office)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim struck out
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Exclusive Cognisance of Parliament, Hereditary Peerage, House of Lords Act 1999, Human Rights (echr)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Baron Mereworth
Applicant/claimant
Ministry of Justice (Crown Office)
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to determine entitlement to a Writ of Summons for the House of Lords
- 2 Whether the House of Lords Act 1999 repealed the Letters Patent creating the Barony of Mereworth
- 3 Whether the right to sit and vote in the House of Lords is a civil right under Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no jurisdiction to determine entitlement to a Writ of Summons for the House of Lords, as this falls within the exclusive cognisance of Parliament. Even if jurisdiction existed, section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords, and the claim would fail on its merits.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out
Orders
- The claim is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment