A v B
The Administrative Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain Article 10 ECHR claims against the Security Service; such claims must be brought before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal as mandated by RIPA s.65(2)(a). The statutory scheme created by the HRA and RIPA from 2 October 2000 assigned exclusive jurisdiction to the IPT for these matters.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: A; Defendant/appellant: B
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Administrative Court on Jurisdictional Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Investigatory Powers Tribunal, Article 10 ECHR, Judicial Review, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Human Rights Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Claimant/respondent
B
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Administrative Court on Jurisdictional Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Administrative Court has jurisdiction to hear Article 10 ECHR claims against the Security Service or if exclusive jurisdiction lies with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal under RIPA s.65(2)(a)
- 2 Interpretation of 'the only appropriate tribunal' in RIPA s.65(2)(a) and its effect on court jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The Administrative Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain Article 10 ECHR claims against the Security Service; such claims must be brought before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal as mandated by RIPA s.65(2)(a). The statutory scheme created by the HRA and RIPA from 2 October 2000 assigned exclusive jurisdiction to the IPT for these matters.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Orders of Collins J on 4 July 2008 set aside
- Declaration that the Administrative Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the Article 10 claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment