Katsouris Brothers Ltd v Haitoglou Bros SA

Katsouris Brothers Ltd v Haitoglou Bros SA

The English court refused to extend time for service of the Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action due to KBL’s persistent and intentional delay, lack of promptness, and failure to comply with procedural rules. The court found that the Greek court was first seised of the relevant issues between the same parties and involving the same cause of action, and therefore, pursuant to Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation, the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action must be stayed until the jurisdiction of the Greek court is established.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Katsouris Brothers Limited; Defendant/applicant: Haitoglou Bros S. A.; Claimant: Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited; Claimant: Bakkavor Foods Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/tort/contribution) / Ruling on Applications Regarding Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, and Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
KBL’s application to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action dismissed; Queen’s Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in the KFF action stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction Under Brussels I Regulation, Extension of Time for Service of Particulars, Abuse of Process, Forum Non Conveniens, Contribution Under Civil Liability Contribution Act 1978, Negative Declaratory Relief, Lis Pendens (first Seised Court)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 37 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Katsouris Brothers Limited

Claimant/respondent

Haitoglou Bros S. A.

Defendant/applicant

Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited

Claimant

Bakkavor Foods Limited

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil (commercial/tort/contribution) / Ruling on Applications Regarding Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, and Stay of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the English court should grant an extension of time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action
  2. 2 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over the tort and contribution claims against the Greek defendant under the Judgments Regulation
  3. 3 Whether the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action should be stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation due to prior Greek proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The English court refused to extend time for service of the Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action due to KBL’s persistent and intentional delay, lack of promptness, and failure to comply with procedural rules. The court found that the Greek court was first seised of the relevant issues between the same parties and involving the same cause of action, and therefore, pursuant to Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation, the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action must be stayed until the jurisdiction of the Greek court is established.

Court Disposition

KBL’s application to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action dismissed; Queen’s Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in the KFF action stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.

Orders

  • KBL’s application for extension of time refused.
  • Queen’s Bench action struck out.