Katsouris Brothers Ltd v Haitoglou Bros SA
The English court refused to extend time for service of the Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action due to KBL’s persistent and intentional delay, lack of promptness, and failure to comply with procedural rules. The court found that the Greek court was first seised of the relevant issues between the same parties and involving the same cause of action, and therefore, pursuant to Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation, the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action must be stayed until the jurisdiction of the Greek court is established.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Katsouris Brothers Limited; Defendant/applicant: Haitoglou Bros S. A.; Claimant: Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited; Claimant: Bakkavor Foods Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/tort/contribution) / Ruling on Applications Regarding Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, and Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- KBL’s application to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action dismissed; Queen’s Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in the KFF action stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Under Brussels I Regulation, Extension of Time for Service of Particulars, Abuse of Process, Forum Non Conveniens, Contribution Under Civil Liability Contribution Act 1978, Negative Declaratory Relief, Lis Pendens (first Seised Court)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Katsouris Brothers Limited
Claimant/respondent
Haitoglou Bros S. A.
Defendant/applicant
Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited
Claimant
Bakkavor Foods Limited
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/tort/contribution) / Ruling on Applications Regarding Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, and Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should grant an extension of time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action
- 2 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over the tort and contribution claims against the Greek defendant under the Judgments Regulation
- 3 Whether the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action should be stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation due to prior Greek proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The English court refused to extend time for service of the Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action due to KBL’s persistent and intentional delay, lack of promptness, and failure to comply with procedural rules. The court found that the Greek court was first seised of the relevant issues between the same parties and involving the same cause of action, and therefore, pursuant to Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation, the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action must be stayed until the jurisdiction of the Greek court is established.
Court Disposition
KBL’s application to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen’s Bench action dismissed; Queen’s Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in the KFF action stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
Orders
- KBL’s application for extension of time refused.
- Queen’s Bench action struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment