Katsouris Brothers Ltd v Haitoglou Bros SA [2011] EWHC 111 (QB) (31 January 2011)
The English court refused to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action due to KBL's persistent delay, lack of promptness, and failure to comply with procedural rules, amounting to an abuse of process. The court further held that the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action and the Greek Proceedings involved the same parties and cause of action, and since the Greek court was first seised, the English proceedings must be stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 111
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Katsouris Brothers Limited; Defendant/applicant: Haitoglou Bros S.A.; Claimant: Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited; Claimant: Bakkavor Foods Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/tort/contribution Proceedings / Interlocutory Applications Regarding Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, and Stay
- Outcome
- KBL's application for extension of time dismissed; Queen's Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in KFF action stayed.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Under Brussels Regulation, Contribution Claims, Extension of Time for Service, Forum Non Conveniens, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Katsouris Brothers Limited
Claimant/respondent
Haitoglou Bros S.A.
Defendant/applicant
Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited
Claimant
Bakkavor Foods Limited
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Commercial/tort/contribution Proceedings / Interlocutory Applications Regarding Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over tort and contribution claims against a Greek defendant under Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 (Judgments Regulation)
- 2 Whether to grant an extension of time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action
- 3 Whether the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action should be stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation
Ratio Decidendi
The English court refused to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action due to KBL's persistent delay, lack of promptness, and failure to comply with procedural rules, amounting to an abuse of process. The court further held that the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action and the Greek Proceedings involved the same parties and cause of action, and since the Greek court was first seised, the English proceedings must be stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
Court Disposition
KBL's application for extension of time dismissed; Queen's Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in KFF action stayed.
Orders
- Dismissal of KBL's application to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action
- Striking out of the Queen's Bench action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment