Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Ors
The English court, having substantive jurisdiction over the judgment debtors, has jurisdiction under CPR 71 to order an officer of a judgment debtor (TK) to attend court and provide information for enforcement, even if resident abroad. The Evidence Regulation does not apply to such orders, and the Brussels I Regulation does not preclude them. Service out of the jurisdiction is permissible. The order against SK was properly set aside as he was not an officer of the judgment debtor. The order against TK should be restored, subject to any remaining issues as to service.
- Parties
- Claimant/judgment Creditor/appellant: Munib Masri; Defendant/judgment Debtor: Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL; Defendant/judgment Debtor: Consolidated Contractors (Oil & Gas) Company SAL; Addressee/respondent: Toufic Said Khoury; Addressee/respondent: Samer Said Khoury
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Setting Aside Without Notice Order Under CPR 71
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Under CPR 71, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Brussels I Regulation, Evidence Regulation, Full and Frank Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Munib Masri
Claimant/judgment Creditor/appellant
Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL
Defendant/judgment Debtor
Consolidated Contractors (Oil & Gas) Company SAL
Defendant/judgment Debtor
Toufic Said Khoury
Addressee/respondent
Samer Said Khoury
Addressee/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Setting Aside Without Notice Order Under CPR 71
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court had jurisdiction under CPR 71 to order a foreign officer of a foreign judgment debtor to attend court and provide information for enforcement purposes
- 2 Whether the Evidence Regulation or Brussels I Regulation precluded such an order
- 3 Whether the order could be served out of the jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The English court, having substantive jurisdiction over the judgment debtors, has jurisdiction under CPR 71 to order an officer of a judgment debtor (TK) to attend court and provide information for enforcement, even if resident abroad. The Evidence Regulation does not apply to such orders, and the Brussels I Regulation does not preclude them. Service out of the jurisdiction is permissible. The order against SK was properly set aside as he was not an officer of the judgment debtor. The order against TK should be restored, subject to any remaining issues as to service.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Orders
- Appeal dismissed as to SK; order against SK set aside
- Appeal allowed as to TK; order against TK restored, subject to any remaining issues as to service
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment