Katsouris Brothers Ltd v Haitoglou Bros SA [2011] EWHC 111 (Comm) (31 January 2011)
The English Court refused to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action due to KBL's persistent and intentional failure to comply with procedural rules, lack of promptness, and insufficient explanation for delay. The Court held that the Greek Court was first seised of the relevant matters, and that the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action involved the same parties and cause of action as the Greek proceedings. Accordingly, the Queen's Bench action was struck out and the Part 20 Claim was stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 111 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Katsouris Brothers Limited; Defendant/applicant: Haitoglou Bros S. A.; Claimant: Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited; Claimant: Bakkavor Foods Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Proceedings (queen's Bench Division) and Part 20 Proceedings / Ruling on Applications for Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, and Stay
- Outcome
- Queen's Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in KFF action stayed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Under Council Regulation (ec) 44/2001, Forum Non Conveniens, Contribution Under Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978, Extension of Time for Service of Particulars of Claim, Abuse of Process, Negative Declaratory Relief, Stay of Proceedings Under Article 27
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Katsouris Brothers Limited
Claimant/respondent
Haitoglou Bros S. A.
Defendant/applicant
Katsouris Fresh Foods Limited
Claimant
Bakkavor Foods Limited
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings (queen's Bench Division) and Part 20 Proceedings / Ruling on Applications for Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English Court has jurisdiction over the tort and contribution claims against a Greek defendant under the Judgments Regulation
- 2 Whether the Queen's Bench action should be struck out for failure to serve Particulars of Claim
- 3 Whether the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action should be stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation
Ratio Decidendi
The English Court refused to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action due to KBL's persistent and intentional failure to comply with procedural rules, lack of promptness, and insufficient explanation for delay. The Court held that the Greek Court was first seised of the relevant matters, and that the Part 20 Claim in the KFF action involved the same parties and cause of action as the Greek proceedings. Accordingly, the Queen's Bench action was struck out and the Part 20 Claim was stayed under Article 27 of the Judgments Regulation.
Court Disposition
Queen's Bench action struck out; Part 20 Claim in KFF action stayed
Orders
- KBL's application to extend time for service of Particulars of Claim in the Queen's Bench action dismissed
- Queen's Bench action struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment