Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA v Kaupthing Bank HF & Ors [2011] EWHC 566 (Comm) (16 March 2011)
At the time the English proceedings were commenced, there was neither a Directive-compliant reorganisation measure nor winding-up in Iceland, so the English court retained jurisdiction under the Lugano Convention; the subsequent opening of winding-up proceedings in Iceland did not retrospectively affect the pending English lawsuits, and there was no abuse of process in the Claimants pursuing their claims in England.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 566 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA (in its capacity as the trustee of the Tchenguiz Discretionary Trust); Claimants/respondents: Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA (in its capacity as the trustee of the Tchenguiz Family Trust) and others; Defendant/applicant: Kaupthing Bank HF; Second Defendant: Oscatello Investments Ltd (BVI)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Proceedings (applications to Stay Proceedings for Want of Jurisdiction) / Judgment on Application to Stay Proceedings
- Outcome
- Defendant's application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Under Lugano Convention, Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings, Effect of Insolvency on Pending Lawsuits, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA (in its capacity as the trustee of the Tchenguiz Discretionary Trust)
Claimant/respondent
Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA (in its capacity as the trustee of the Tchenguiz Family Trust) and others
Claimants/respondents
Kaupthing Bank HF
Defendant/applicant
Oscatello Investments Ltd (BVI)
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings (applications to Stay Proceedings for Want of Jurisdiction) / Judgment on Application to Stay Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether English proceedings should be stayed due to Icelandic insolvency proceedings against Kaupthing Bank HF
- 2 Whether there was a Directive-compliant reorganisation measure or winding-up in Iceland at the time English proceedings commenced
- 3 Whether English proceedings are an abuse of process given proofs of debt filed in Icelandic winding-up
Ratio Decidendi
At the time the English proceedings were commenced, there was neither a Directive-compliant reorganisation measure nor winding-up in Iceland, so the English court retained jurisdiction under the Lugano Convention; the subsequent opening of winding-up proceedings in Iceland did not retrospectively affect the pending English lawsuits, and there was no abuse of process in the Claimants pursuing their claims in England.
Court Disposition
Defendant's application dismissed
Orders
- No stay of English proceedings
- English court retains jurisdiction under the Lugano Convention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment