Dosanjh v Balendran & Anor (Re Webb Estate Developments Ltd - Insolvency Act 1986) [2025] EWHC 507 (Ch) (07 March 2025)
There is both functional deadlock and irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence between the two shareholders/directors, rendering the company incapable of functioning in accordance with its intended quasi-partnership basis. The petitioner is not disentitled to relief by reason of his conduct, as both parties contributed to the breakdown. No realistic or practical alternative remedy exists, and the requirements of section 125(5) of the Insolvency Act 1986 are satisfied. It is just and equitable to wind up the company.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 507 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Parminder Singh Dosanjh; First Respondent: Vallipuram Balendran; Second Respondent: Webb Estate Developments Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition (just and Equitable Ground) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Winding up order granted
- Legal Topics
- Just and Equitable Winding Up, Quasi Partnership, Shareholder Deadlock, Directors' Duties, Remuneration and Expenses, Clean Hands Doctrine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parminder Singh Dosanjh
Petitioner
Vallipuram Balendran
First Respondent
Webb Estate Developments Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition (just and Equitable Ground) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the company should be wound up on the just and equitable ground under section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether there is functional deadlock and/or irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence between the shareholders/directors
- 3 Whether the petitioner comes to court with clean hands or is disentitled to relief by his conduct
Ratio Decidendi
There is both functional deadlock and irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence between the two shareholders/directors, rendering the company incapable of functioning in accordance with its intended quasi-partnership basis. The petitioner is not disentitled to relief by reason of his conduct, as both parties contributed to the breakdown. No realistic or practical alternative remedy exists, and the requirements of section 125(5) of the Insolvency Act 1986 are satisfied. It is just and equitable to wind up the company.
Court Disposition
Winding up order granted
Orders
- Webb Estate Developments Ltd is to be wound up on the just and equitable ground under section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 1986.
- The Official Receiver is appointed as liquidator.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment