Byers & Ors v The Saudi National Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 43 (27 January 2022)
A claim for knowing receipt cannot succeed unless the claimant has a continuing proprietary interest in the property at the time of receipt; under Saudi Arabian law, SICL's interest was extinguished upon transfer, defeating the claim.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 43
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mark Byers; Claimant/appellant: Hugh Dickson; Claimant/appellant: Saad Investments Company Limited; Defendant/respondent: The Saudi National Bank
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, Proprietary Interest, Foreign Law, Block Discount Valuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Byers
Claimant/appellant
Hugh Dickson
Claimant/appellant
Saad Investments Company Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Saudi National Bank
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claim for knowing receipt depends on the claimant having a continuing proprietary interest in the property when in the hands of the defendant
- 2 Whether such an interest existed in the present case under Saudi Arabian law
- 3 Whether a block discount should be applied to the valuation of the disputed securities
Ratio Decidendi
A claim for knowing receipt cannot succeed unless the claimant has a continuing proprietary interest in the property at the time of receipt; under Saudi Arabian law, SICL's interest was extinguished upon transfer, defeating the claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claim for knowing receipt dismissed
- No relief granted to claimants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment