Fuller v Strum [2001] EWCA Civ 1551 (11 October 2001)
The application for further disclosure was refused because the relevant information is what the testator believed the value of his estate to be in 1989, not the current value, and because the respondent is not presently the administrator and has already provided all information available to him.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1551
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Michael Fuller; Defendant/respondent: Geoffrey Bernard Strum
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceedings (appeal) / Interlocutory Application Before Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed save for direction for affidavit
- Legal Topics
- Knowledge and Approval of Will, Forgery of Will, Admissibility of Further Evidence, Proportion of Legacies to Estate Value
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Fuller
Claimant/applicant
Geoffrey Bernard Strum
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceedings (appeal) / Interlocutory Application Before Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testator knew and approved the contents of the 1989 will
- 2 Whether the 1989 will was a forgery
- 3 Whether further disclosure of estate assets and values should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The application for further disclosure was refused because the relevant information is what the testator believed the value of his estate to be in 1989, not the current value, and because the respondent is not presently the administrator and has already provided all information available to him.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed save for direction for affidavit
Orders
- Mr Geoffrey Strum to make an affidavit confirming that all information known to him about the estate's assets, either now or in 1989, is included in the solicitor's affidavit, with any additional information to be added if known.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment