The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation & Ors v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors
The court ruled that requests for further information regarding reliance, causation, and loss are proper and must be answered for a sample of four banks within specified timeframes, balancing the need for information with the practical burdens on the Claimant as receiver. Orders for quantum information and underlying documents are limited to what is reasonably available. Fast-track disclosure for non-performing loans and retention of adverse documents from withdrawing banks is not ordered, as assurances have been given. Costs for the application to amend are awarded to the Defendants, but costs relating to discontinuance are not awarded to the BBA Parties, given the commonality of issues...
- Parties
- Claimant: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Amcore Bank, N. A. and Others; Defendants: Barclays Bank PLC and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Case Management Conference (cmc) Extempore Rulings
- Outcome
- Orders made for provision of further information and quantum calculations within specified timeframes; costs of amendment application awarded to Defendants; no costs awarded to BBA Parties for discontinuance; other disclosure and case management directions given.
- Legal Topics
- LIBOR Manipulation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy, Aiding and Abetting, Case Management, Disclosure, Quantum of Damages, Costs, Reliance, Loss and Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Amcore Bank, N. A. and Others
Claimant
Barclays Bank PLC and Others
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil / Case Management Conference (cmc) Extempore Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certain paragraphs should be included in the list of common ground and issues
- 2 Adequacy and timing of further information requests regarding reliance, causation, and loss
- 3 Provision of quantum information and underlying documents
Ratio Decidendi
The court ruled that requests for further information regarding reliance, causation, and loss are proper and must be answered for a sample of four banks within specified timeframes, balancing the need for information with the practical burdens on the Claimant as receiver. Orders for quantum information and underlying documents are limited to what is reasonably available. Fast-track disclosure for non-performing loans and retention of adverse documents from withdrawing banks is not ordered, as assurances have been given. Costs for the application to amend are awarded to the Defendants, but costs relating to discontinuance are not awarded to the BBA Parties, given the commonality of issues...
Court Disposition
Orders made for provision of further information and quantum calculations within specified timeframes; costs of amendment application awarded to Defendants; no costs awarded to BBA Parties for discontinuance; other disclosure and case management directions given.
Orders
- Claimant to provide further clarification of its case under US law within eight weeks.
- Claimant to provide detailed answers regarding reliance for four sample banks by end of September.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment