Wells v Pilling Parish Council [2008] EWHC 556 (Ch) (06 March 2008)
The application by Pilling Parish Council to alter the register was a matter of private law, not public law. As such, the Council needed to have standing, which it did not possess. Therefore, the adjudicator should have exercised his power to strike out the Council's application, and the appeal was allowed.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 556 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mr Stephen Wells; Defendant/appellant: Pilling Parish Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Adjudicator's Preliminary Issue Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Land Registration, Possessory Title, Standing to Apply for Alteration of Register, Private Law Vs Public Law Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Stephen Wells
Claimant/respondent
Pilling Parish Council
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Adjudicator's Preliminary Issue Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pilling Parish Council had standing to apply for alteration of the land register under the Land Registration Act 2002
- 2 Whether the application to alter the register is a matter of private law or public law
Ratio Decidendi
The application by Pilling Parish Council to alter the register was a matter of private law, not public law. As such, the Council needed to have standing, which it did not possess. Therefore, the adjudicator should have exercised his power to strike out the Council's application, and the appeal was allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Application by Pilling Parish Council to alter the register is cancelled
- Pilling Parish Council is removed as a party from the objection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment