Dunsfold Park Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2013] EWHC 1878 (Admin) (03 July 2013)
The 1951 planning permission did not authorise unrestricted aviation activities but was limited to erection, repair, and flight testing of aircraft. Following the cessation of BAe's activities and the Claimant's acquisition of the site, a material change of use occurred, and subsequent temporary planning permissions with enforceable conditions governed aviation activities. As a result, the Claimant was not entitled to a certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities under section 191.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1878 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Dunsfold Park Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Waverley Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / High Court Judgment on Application to Quash Inspector's Decision Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lawful Development Certificates, Interpretation of Planning Permissions, Material Change of Use, Enforcement Under Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunsfold Park Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Waverley Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / High Court Judgment on Application to Quash Inspector's Decision Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1951 planning permission for Dunsfold Aerodrome permits unrestricted aviation activities
- 2 Whether subsequent temporary planning permissions superseded or extinguished rights under the 1951 permission
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities under section 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Ratio Decidendi
The 1951 planning permission did not authorise unrestricted aviation activities but was limited to erection, repair, and flight testing of aircraft. Following the cessation of BAe's activities and the Claimant's acquisition of the site, a material change of use occurred, and subsequent temporary planning permissions with enforceable conditions governed aviation activities. As a result, the Claimant was not entitled to a certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities under section 191.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application to quash the Inspector's decision refused
- No certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities to be issued
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment