Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011)
The correct test for lawful arrest under section 24 is whether the officer honestly believed arrest was necessary for a statutory reason and whether that belief was objectively reasonable on the facts known to him; active consideration of all alternatives is not required. The arrest and detention of Mr Hayes were lawful under this test.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 911
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Scott Hayes; Defendant/respondent: The Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lawful Arrest, Necessity for Arrest, Police Discretion, Wrongful Arrest, Unlawful Detention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott Hayes
Claimant/appellant
The Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arrest of Mr Hayes was lawful under section 24 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
- 2 Whether continued detention became unlawful once the complainant indicated he did not wish to pursue the allegation
Ratio Decidendi
The correct test for lawful arrest under section 24 is whether the officer honestly believed arrest was necessary for a statutory reason and whether that belief was objectively reasonable on the facts known to him; active consideration of all alternatives is not required. The arrest and detention of Mr Hayes were lawful under this test.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No damages awarded
- No declaration of unlawful arrest or detention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment