Fairgate International Ltd v Citibank International Plc
Clauses 2(8)(B)(i) and (ii) are not mutually exclusive; the landlord may require the tenant to comply with either or both, except to the extent that compliance with one renders the other inconsistent or unnecessary. The notice of 28 August 2002 was valid and not void for uncertainty, as it sufficiently informed the tenant of its obligations, with details to be finalised as per the lease.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Fairgate International Limited; Defendant/appellant: Citibank International plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issues Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lease Construction, Yielding Up Premises, Repair Covenants, Notice Validity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fairgate International Limited
Claimant/respondent
Citibank International plc
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issues Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 2(8)(B)(i) and (ii) of the lease are mutually exclusive or can be invoked together
- 2 Whether the notice of 28 August 2002 was valid or void for uncertainty
Ratio Decidendi
Clauses 2(8)(B)(i) and (ii) are not mutually exclusive; the landlord may require the tenant to comply with either or both, except to the extent that compliance with one renders the other inconsistent or unnecessary. The notice of 28 August 2002 was valid and not void for uncertainty, as it sufficiently informed the tenant of its obligations, with details to be finalised as per the lease.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the declarations of the trial judge are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment