BMR Bagshot Ltd v Dorchester Mansions (1997) Ltd [2021] EWHC 2951 (Ch) (12 October 2021)
The works carried out by BMR fell within the lease covenants requiring landlord's consent, as they affected the form or structure of the demised premises. Technical irregularities in DML's authorisation did not nullify the injunction, and the judge's decision not to award costs to BMR was within his discretion.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2951 (Ch)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: BMR Bagshot Ltd; Respondent/claimant: Dorchester Mansions (1997) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Two County Court Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leasehold Covenants, Interim Injunctions, Company Authorisation, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BMR Bagshot Ltd
Appellant/defendant
Dorchester Mansions (1997) Limited
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Two County Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refurbishment works required landlord's consent under lease covenants
- 2 Whether proceedings and cross-undertaking were validly authorised by company
- 3 Appropriateness of costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The works carried out by BMR fell within the lease covenants requiring landlord's consent, as they affected the form or structure of the demised premises. Technical irregularities in DML's authorisation did not nullify the injunction, and the judge's decision not to award costs to BMR was within his discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Costs awarded to respondent on summary assessment basis, reduced to £35,000 inclusive of VAT
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment