Neville v Cowdray Trust Ltd & Anor
The property at the commencement of the tenancy consisted of two hereditaments with rateable values shown in the valuation list, and the aggregate of these values is the relevant rateable value for section 4A(2)(b). The fact that the property was later converted into a single dwelling house does not alter the statutory requirement to use the rateable value at the tenancy's commencement.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Caroline Linda Annette Neville; Defendant/appellant: The Cowdray Trust Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Rathbone Trust Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Leasehold Enfranchisement, Interpretation of Leasehold Reform Act 1967, Rateable Value Determination, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caroline Linda Annette Neville
Claimant/respondent
The Cowdray Trust Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Rathbone Trust Company Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property subject to the tenancy had a rateable value at the commencement of the tenancy for the purposes of section 4A(2)(b) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 as amended
- 2 Whether the relevant rateable value is that of the original two cottages or the converted single dwelling house
Ratio Decidendi
The property at the commencement of the tenancy consisted of two hereditaments with rateable values shown in the valuation list, and the aggregate of these values is the relevant rateable value for section 4A(2)(b). The fact that the property was later converted into a single dwelling house does not alter the statutory requirement to use the rateable value at the tenancy's commencement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; the respondent is not entitled to acquire the freehold under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 on the facts as found.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment