Jacey Property Company Ltd v de Sousa

Jacey Property Company Ltd v de Sousa

The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge's findings on estoppel, waiver, and the scope of the repairing covenant were not undermined by any omission to address specific evidence; the machinery for determining contributions to repairs under the lease must be followed, and the repairing covenant did not extend to common drains except where physical support was affected.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Jacey Property Company Limited; Defendant/appellant: Miguel De Sousa; Defendant/appellant: Paula Rosa Pereira De Sousa
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (central London County Court)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except for the claim for contribution to expenses and related interest.
Legal Topics
Lease Interpretation, Repairing Obligations, Waiver and Estoppel, Mesne Profits, Forfeiture of Lease
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Lease Interpretation Repairing Obligations Waiver and Estoppel Mesne Profits Forfeiture of Lease

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jacey Property Company Limited

Claimant/respondent

Miguel De Sousa

Defendant/appellant

Paula Rosa Pereira De Sousa

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (central London County Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent landlord waived or was estopped from enforcing the user clause in the lease
  2. 2 Whether the landlord was entitled to forfeit the lease for non-payment of a contribution to repair of drains
  3. 3 Whether legal costs and interest were properly awarded as a debt under the lease

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge's findings on estoppel, waiver, and the scope of the repairing covenant were not undermined by any omission to address specific evidence; the machinery for determining contributions to repairs under the lease must be followed, and the repairing covenant did not extend to common drains except where physical support was affected.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except for the claim for contribution to expenses and related interest.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed except for the claim for contribution for expenses in the sum of £1,113.58 and related interest.
  • Stay on order for possession removed; possession in 14 days (14 March).