Arnold v Britton & Ors
The service charge clauses, properly construed, require the lessees to pay a fixed sum increasing at 10% per annum compounded, irrespective of the actual expenses incurred by the lessor, and do not operate as a cap or variable charge. The court cannot rewrite the bargain or introduce a cap not present in the language of the lease.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Paddy Arnold; Defendants/appellants: Rodney Britton & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lease Interpretation, Service Charges, Landlord and Tenant, Contractual Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paddy Arnold
Claimant/respondent
Rodney Britton & Ors
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of service charge clauses in long leases
- 2 Whether the service charge is fixed or variable and subject to a cap
- 3 Whether the service charge falls within the meaning of s.18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Ratio Decidendi
The service charge clauses, properly construed, require the lessees to pay a fixed sum increasing at 10% per annum compounded, irrespective of the actual expenses incurred by the lessor, and do not operate as a cap or variable charge. The court cannot rewrite the bargain or introduce a cap not present in the language of the lease.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declarations granted in favour of the lessor: the service charge is a fixed sum rising by 10% per annum compounded, not subject to a cap, and not a variable service charge under s.18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment