Scott v The National Trust [1998] EWHC 318 (Ch) (12 November 1998)

Scott v The National Trust [1998] EWHC 318 (Ch) (12 November 1998)

The adjournment is granted to allow the National Trust to submit further evidence, as this may provide a 'knock-out' point or substantially narrow the issues, and it is in the interests of justice and procedural fairness for the court to have all relevant material before determining leave. The short delay does not cause significant prejudice to the plaintiffs, and the National Trust's late application does not justify excluding potentially decisive evidence.

Citation
[1998] EWHC 318 (Ch)
Parties
Applicant/defendant: National Trust for Places of Historical Interest or Natural Beauty; Plaintiffs/applicants: Six individuals (representatives of the Devon and Somerset Stag Hounds and the Quantock Stag Hounds); Interested Party: Charity Commissioners
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 November 1998
Procedural Posture
Charity Proceedings (application for Leave to Challenge Decision) / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment and Joinder
Outcome
Adjournment granted; National Trust joined as party; directions for evidence and further hearing set.
Legal Topics
Leave to Challenge Charity Decision, Adjournment, Procedural Fairness, Joinder of Parties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Trust for Places of Historical Interest or Natural Beauty

Applicant/defendant

Six individuals (representatives of the Devon and Somerset Stag Hounds and the Quantock Stag Hounds)

Plaintiffs/applicants

Charity Commissioners

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Charity Proceedings (application for Leave to Challenge Decision) / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment and Joinder

  1. 1 Whether the National Trust should be joined as a party to the proceedings
  2. 2 Whether an adjournment should be granted to allow the National Trust to put in further evidence
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to challenge the National Trust's October decision banning stag hunting

Ratio Decidendi

The adjournment is granted to allow the National Trust to submit further evidence, as this may provide a 'knock-out' point or substantially narrow the issues, and it is in the interests of justice and procedural fairness for the court to have all relevant material before determining leave. The short delay does not cause significant prejudice to the plaintiffs, and the National Trust's late application does not justify excluding potentially decisive evidence.

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted; National Trust joined as party; directions for evidence and further hearing set.

Orders

  • Proceedings adjourned for at least seven days to allow National Trust to submit evidence.
  • Plaintiffs to have seven days to reply to new evidence.