Scott v The National Trust [1998] EWHC 318 (Ch) (12 November 1998)
The adjournment is granted to allow the National Trust to submit further evidence, as this may provide a 'knock-out' point or substantially narrow the issues, and it is in the interests of justice and procedural fairness for the court to have all relevant material before determining leave. The short delay does not cause significant prejudice to the plaintiffs, and the National Trust's late application does not justify excluding potentially decisive evidence.
- Citation
- [1998] EWHC 318 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant/defendant: National Trust for Places of Historical Interest or Natural Beauty; Plaintiffs/applicants: Six individuals (representatives of the Devon and Somerset Stag Hounds and the Quantock Stag Hounds); Interested Party: Charity Commissioners
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Charity Proceedings (application for Leave to Challenge Decision) / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment and Joinder
- Outcome
- Adjournment granted; National Trust joined as party; directions for evidence and further hearing set.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Challenge Charity Decision, Adjournment, Procedural Fairness, Joinder of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Trust for Places of Historical Interest or Natural Beauty
Applicant/defendant
Six individuals (representatives of the Devon and Somerset Stag Hounds and the Quantock Stag Hounds)
Plaintiffs/applicants
Charity Commissioners
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Charity Proceedings (application for Leave to Challenge Decision) / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment and Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the National Trust should be joined as a party to the proceedings
- 2 Whether an adjournment should be granted to allow the National Trust to put in further evidence
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to challenge the National Trust's October decision banning stag hunting
Ratio Decidendi
The adjournment is granted to allow the National Trust to submit further evidence, as this may provide a 'knock-out' point or substantially narrow the issues, and it is in the interests of justice and procedural fairness for the court to have all relevant material before determining leave. The short delay does not cause significant prejudice to the plaintiffs, and the National Trust's late application does not justify excluding potentially decisive evidence.
Court Disposition
Adjournment granted; National Trust joined as party; directions for evidence and further hearing set.
Orders
- Proceedings adjourned for at least seven days to allow National Trust to submit evidence.
- Plaintiffs to have seven days to reply to new evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment