S (A Child)
The appeal was allowed because the hearing below was procedurally unfair: the judge lacked the baseline findings from the placement order judgment to assess change in circumstances, and the mother was denied the opportunity to see and challenge the Annex A report, which the judge heavily relied upon. These deficiencies undermined the integrity of the process and the fairness owed to the mother.
- Parties
- Appellant (mother): ES; Respondent (local Authority): Hull City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family/adoption) / Appeal From Refusal of Leave to Oppose Adoption Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Oppose Adoption Order, Procedural Fairness, Disclosure of Confidential Reports, Change in Circumstances Test, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ES
Appellant (mother)
Hull City Council
Respondent (local Authority)
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family/adoption) / Appeal From Refusal of Leave to Oppose Adoption Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother was afforded due process in the hearing of her application for leave to oppose the adoption order
- 2 Whether the absence of a transcript of the placement order judgment and non-disclosure of the Annex A report rendered the hearing unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the hearing below was procedurally unfair: the judge lacked the baseline findings from the placement order judgment to assess change in circumstances, and the mother was denied the opportunity to see and challenge the Annex A report, which the judge heavily relied upon. These deficiencies undermined the integrity of the process and the fairness owed to the mother.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of HHJ Jack refusing leave to oppose adoption set aside
- Case remitted for rehearing of the mother's application for leave to oppose the adoption order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment