WA, R (on the application of) v Director of Legal Aid Casework & Anor
Means Regulation 25(2)(b) must be interpreted according to its ordinary and natural meaning, which permits a dependent child to be a member of more than one household for legal aid means assessment. The Legal Aid Agency's Decision and the Guidance were wrong in law to require a choice between parental households and to deny the dependants' allowance to both parents. The Decision must be quashed and reconsidered on the correct legal basis.
- Parties
- Claimant: WA; First Defendant: Director of Legal Aid Casework; Second Defendant: The Lord Chancellor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision quashed; Guidance quashed; matter remitted for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid Eligibility, Means Assessment, Household Definition, Guidance Interpretation, ECHR Article 6, ECHR Article 8
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WA
Claimant
Director of Legal Aid Casework
First Defendant
The Lord Chancellor
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a dependent child can be a member of more than one household for legal aid means assessment
- 2 Proper construction of Means Regulation 25(2)(b)
- 3 Relevance of child benefit and residence in determining household membership
Ratio Decidendi
Means Regulation 25(2)(b) must be interpreted according to its ordinary and natural meaning, which permits a dependent child to be a member of more than one household for legal aid means assessment. The Legal Aid Agency's Decision and the Guidance were wrong in law to require a choice between parental households and to deny the dependants' allowance to both parents. The Decision must be quashed and reconsidered on the correct legal basis.
Court Disposition
Decision quashed; Guidance quashed; matter remitted for reconsideration.
Orders
- Paragraph 7 of section 5.6 of the Guidance is quashed.
- The Decision refusing legal aid is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment