Aabar Holdings SARL v Glencore PLC & Ors [2024] EWHC 3046 (Comm) (27 November 2024)
The Shareholder Rule exists in English law but its foundation is historically proprietary, now undermined by the principle of corporate personality. The Rule is recognized but its rationale is shaky; it applies only to registered shareholders, not ultimate beneficial owners, and is limited to legal advice privilege, not litigation privilege or without prejudice privilege. The Rule does not extend to subsidiaries. Glencore may assert privilege against Aabar.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3046 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Aabar Holdings S.À. R. L.; First Defendant: Glencore PLC; Second Defendant: Ivan Glasenberg; Third Defendant: Anthony Bryan Hayward; Fourth Defendant: Steven Frank Kalmin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Financial List Claim / Interlocutory Judgment on Privilege Issues
- Outcome
- Privilege issues determined: Shareholder Rule exists but is limited; Glencore entitled to assert privilege against Aabar.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Shareholder Rights, Joint Interest Privilege, Litigation Exception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aabar Holdings S.À. R. L.
Claimant
Glencore PLC
First Defendant
Ivan Glasenberg
Second Defendant
Anthony Bryan Hayward
Third Defendant
Steven Frank Kalmin
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Financial List Claim / Interlocutory Judgment on Privilege Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Shareholder Rule exist in English law?
- 2 Does the Shareholder Rule apply to legal advice privilege, litigation privilege, and without prejudice privilege?
- 3 Does the Shareholder Rule extend to ultimate beneficial owners or only registered shareholders?
Ratio Decidendi
The Shareholder Rule exists in English law but its foundation is historically proprietary, now undermined by the principle of corporate personality. The Rule is recognized but its rationale is shaky; it applies only to registered shareholders, not ultimate beneficial owners, and is limited to legal advice privilege, not litigation privilege or without prejudice privilege. The Rule does not extend to subsidiaries. Glencore may assert privilege against Aabar.
Court Disposition
Privilege issues determined: Shareholder Rule exists but is limited; Glencore entitled to assert privilege against Aabar.
Orders
- Glencore may withhold privileged documents from Aabar except those relating to periods when Aabar was a registered shareholder, if any.
- Shareholder Rule does not apply to ultimate beneficial owners or subsidiaries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment