Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP
The Court held that 'joint privilege' is a matter of English procedural law, not trust law, and thus Bahamian law does not preclude the beneficiary's right to access documents under English law. However, the paper files held by Taylor Wessing were not a 'relevant filing system' under the Data Protection Act 1998, as their structure did not enable ready access to personal data by reference to individuals; access required manual review by skilled staff, not a structured system.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mrs Ashley Judith Dawson-Damer; Claimant: Mr Piers Dawson-Damer; Claimant: Ms Adelicia Dawson-Damer; Respondent/defendant: Taylor Wessing LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Subject Access Requests, Relevant Filing System, Disclosure, Trust Beneficiaries' Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Ashley Judith Dawson-Damer
Appellant/claimant
Mr Piers Dawson-Damer
Claimant
Ms Adelicia Dawson-Damer
Claimant
Taylor Wessing LLP
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Taylor Wessing LLP can rely on the legal professional privilege (LPP) exemption under the Data Protection Act 1998 in respect of documents relating to trust beneficiaries
- 2 Whether Taylor Wessing's paper files constitute a 'relevant filing system' under the Data Protection Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that 'joint privilege' is a matter of English procedural law, not trust law, and thus Bahamian law does not preclude the beneficiary's right to access documents under English law. However, the paper files held by Taylor Wessing were not a 'relevant filing system' under the Data Protection Act 1998, as their structure did not enable ready access to personal data by reference to individuals; access required manual review by skilled staff, not a structured system.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Ashley Dawson-Damer's appeal on the LPP issue is allowed; Taylor Wessing cannot rely on the LPP exemption as against her for pre-litigation documents under English law.
- Taylor Wessing's appeal on the Data Protection Issue is allowed; the 35 paper files are not a 'relevant filing system' under the Data Protection Act 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment