Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1327 (12 September 2017)
Legal professional privilege attached to the documents in question and no exception (such as fraud or waiver) applied; therefore, the defendants were not entitled to retain, use, or disclose the privileged material, and the High Court's order for return, destruction, and restraint was correct.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 1327
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Bruno Lachaux; Defendant/appellant: Independent Print Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Injunctive Relief Regarding Legal Professional Privilege
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Confidential Information, Injunctive Relief, Disclosure of Privileged Documents, Public Interest Exception, Defamation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bruno Lachaux
Claimant/respondent
Independent Print Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Injunctive Relief Regarding Legal Professional Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants may retain and use documents subject to legal professional privilege (LPP)
- 2 Whether public interest or other exceptions override LPP in this context
- 3 Whether the claimant's conduct justified withholding injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
Legal professional privilege attached to the documents in question and no exception (such as fraud or waiver) applied; therefore, the defendants were not entitled to retain, use, or disclose the privileged material, and the High Court's order for return, destruction, and restraint was correct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Defendants must return the privileged documents to the claimant.
- Defendants must destroy all copies of the privileged documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment