East-West United Bank SA v Gusinski & Ors [2024] EWHC 2223 (Ch) (28 August 2024)
There is a prima facie case that Mr Gusinski, through the New Media Group, engaged in sufficiently dishonest or underhand conduct to avoid repayment of sums owed to the claimant, including misleading courts and arbitral tribunal and diverting funds. This conduct engages the iniquity exception, negating legal professional privilege for communications brought into existence as part of or in furtherance of the scheme.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2223 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: East-West United Bank S.A.; First Defendant: Mr Vladimir Gusinski; Second Defendant: GSC Solicitors LLP; Third Defendant: Mr Barry Samuels; First Respondent: The Financial Secretary of the Cayman Islands; Second Respondent: New Media Programming (in liquidation); Third Respondent: Nova Century Holdings Limited; Fourth Respondent: Progress Studio LLC (in liquidation); Fifth Respondent: Movie Production Center LLC (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Business List / Interlocutory Application for Iniquity Exception to Legal Professional Privilege
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Iniquity Exception, Conspiracy, Breach of Trust, Equitable Assignment, Constructive Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
East-West United Bank S.A.
Claimant
Mr Vladimir Gusinski
First Defendant
GSC Solicitors LLP
Second Defendant
Mr Barry Samuels
Third Defendant
The Financial Secretary of the Cayman Islands
First Respondent
New Media Programming (in liquidation)
Second Respondent
Nova Century Holdings Limited
Third Respondent
Progress Studio LLC (in liquidation)
Fourth Respondent
Movie Production Center LLC (in liquidation)
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Business List / Interlocutory Application for Iniquity Exception to Legal Professional Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the iniquity exception applies to communications between defendants and respondents regarding repayment of sums owed to the claimant
- 2 Whether legal professional privilege is negated by alleged dishonest scheme to avoid repayment
Ratio Decidendi
There is a prima facie case that Mr Gusinski, through the New Media Group, engaged in sufficiently dishonest or underhand conduct to avoid repayment of sums owed to the claimant, including misleading courts and arbitral tribunal and diverting funds. This conduct engages the iniquity exception, negating legal professional privilege for communications brought into existence as part of or in furtherance of the scheme.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- No legal professional privilege applies to documents and communications brought into existence as part of or in furtherance of the alleged scheme to avoid repayment by Mr Gusinski and the New Media Group.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment