Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd

Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd

The documents were confidential and subject to legal professional privilege. There was no waiver or fraud exception. The public interest in truth does not override privilege. The judge's exercise of discretion to grant injunctive relief was correct and justified.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Bruno Lachaux; Defendant/appellant: Independent Print Limited; Defendant/appellant: Evening Standard Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 September 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Legal Professional Privilege, Confidential Information, Injunctive Relief, Defamation, Disclosure of Privileged Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bruno Lachaux

Claimant/respondent

Independent Print Limited

Defendant/appellant

Evening Standard Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendants and their solicitors may retain and use information contained in documents said to be confidential and subject to legal professional privilege (LPP)
  2. 2 Whether injunctive relief restraining use and disclosure of such documents was properly granted

Ratio Decidendi

The documents were confidential and subject to legal professional privilege. There was no waiver or fraud exception. The public interest in truth does not override privilege. The judge's exercise of discretion to grant injunctive relief was correct and justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defendants and their solicitors must return the privileged documents to the claimant.
  • All copies of the privileged documents must be destroyed.