The Counsel General for Wales, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 118 (09 February 2022)
The appeal is dismissed because the claim for judicial review is premature. The court will not grant permission to apply for judicial review to determine the effect of UKIMA on Senedd competence in the absence of specific Senedd legislation. The issues raised are better addressed in the context of concrete legislative proposals, not in the abstract.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 118
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Counsel General for Wales; Defendant/respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy; Interested Party: The Lord Advocate; Interested Party: The Attorney General for Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (application for Permission) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence, Devolution Settlements, Judicial Review Prematurity, Interpretation of Constitutional Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Counsel General for Wales
Claimant/appellant
The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Defendant/respondent
The Lord Advocate
Interested Party
The Attorney General for Northern Ireland
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (application for Permission) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant permission to apply for judicial review to determine the effect of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (UKIMA) on the legislative competence of the Senedd in the absence of specific Senedd legislation
- 2 Whether the amendment of Schedule 7B of the Government of Wales Act 2006 (GoWA) by UKIMA amounts to a reservation or restricts Senedd competence
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the claim for judicial review is premature. The court will not grant permission to apply for judicial review to determine the effect of UKIMA on Senedd competence in the absence of specific Senedd legislation. The issues raised are better addressed in the context of concrete legislative proposals, not in the abstract.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review refused as premature
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment