Centerprise Trust Ltd, R (on the application of) v London Borough Of Hackney [2002] EWCA Civ 967 (2 July 2002)
There was no clear or unambiguous commitment by the council to provide annual funding for the Mare de Gras festival, nor credible evidence of an express assurance; the council's scoring system was properly applied; no evidence of bias in the appeal process was established; and the council was not obliged to consult Centerprise before deciding to sell the property. Accordingly, none of the grounds advanced had a real prospect of success.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 967
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Centerprise Trust Limited; Defendant/respondent: Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hackney
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Application for Permission to Appeal (post Refusal of Permission for Judicial Review)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Judicial Review, Bias, Procedural Impropriety, Grant Funding, Public Law Vs Private Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Centerprise Trust Limited
Claimant/applicant
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hackney
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Application for Permission to Appeal (post Refusal of Permission for Judicial Review)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the council's refusal to fund the Mare de Gras festival breached a legitimate expectation
- 2 Whether there was bias in the council's appeal process
- 3 Whether the council's decision to sell property leased to Centerprise was procedurally improper and susceptible to judicial review
Ratio Decidendi
There was no clear or unambiguous commitment by the council to provide annual funding for the Mare de Gras festival, nor credible evidence of an express assurance; the council's scoring system was properly applied; no evidence of bias in the appeal process was established; and the council was not obliged to consult Centerprise before deciding to sell the property. Accordingly, none of the grounds advanced had a real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment