Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v The Albert Court Residents' Association
The statutory scheme under the Licensing Act 2003 requires the licensing authority to grant a variation application if no relevant representations are received within the prescribed period. Any failure to notify residents or consider late representations, even if it frustrates a legitimate expectation or is irrational, cannot override this statutory duty. The court cannot grant relief that would prevent the authority from complying with its statutory obligation or deprive the applicant of its public law right to the variation.
- Parties
- Appellant / Additional Party: Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences; Respondents: The Albert Court Residents’ Association and others; Appellant / Additional Party: Westminster City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order quashing the variation of the premises licence set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Statutory Duty, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review, Licensing Act 2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences
Appellant / Additional Party
The Albert Court Residents’ Association and others
Respondents
Westminster City Council
Appellant / Additional Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Westminster City Council was required to consider late representations regarding a premises licence variation under the Licensing Act 2003
- 2 Whether failure to notify certain residents of the application frustrated a legitimate expectation and rendered the decision unlawful
- 3 Whether the statutory scheme precluded relief for failure to notify or consider late representations
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory scheme under the Licensing Act 2003 requires the licensing authority to grant a variation application if no relevant representations are received within the prescribed period. Any failure to notify residents or consider late representations, even if it frustrates a legitimate expectation or is irrational, cannot override this statutory duty. The court cannot grant relief that would prevent the authority from complying with its statutory obligation or deprive the applicant of its public law right to the variation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order quashing the variation of the premises licence set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The order of McCombe J quashing the variation of the premises licence is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment