Wheeler, R (on the application of) v Office of the Prime Minister & Anor
The claimant has advanced an arguable case on all grounds: the issue of legitimate expectation is justiciable, does not violate parliamentary privilege, and it is arguable that the promise to hold a referendum extended to the Lisbon Treaty. Permission to apply for judicial review is granted.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr John Stuart Wheeler; First Defendant: Office of the Prime Minister; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission Application
- Outcome
- Permission to apply for judicial review granted
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Judicial Review, Referendum, Parliamentary Privilege, Justiciability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr John Stuart Wheeler
Claimant
Office of the Prime Minister
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the government's refusal to hold a referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon breached a legitimate expectation
- 2 Whether the claim is justiciable
- 3 Whether the claim violates parliamentary privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant has advanced an arguable case on all grounds: the issue of legitimate expectation is justiciable, does not violate parliamentary privilege, and it is arguable that the promise to hold a referendum extended to the Lisbon Treaty. Permission to apply for judicial review is granted.
Court Disposition
Permission to apply for judicial review granted
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review is granted to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment