Cornwall Waste Forum, St Dennis Branch, R (on the application of) v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (13 October 2011)
The inspector and Secretary of State erred in law by failing to consider and decide, as competent authority, whether an appropriate assessment was required under the Habitats Regulations before granting planning permission, and by failing to address the claimant's challenge to the Environment Agency's assessment. A legitimate expectation was created that this issue would be determined in the planning process, and the failure to do so was unfair. The planning authority could not lawfully defer entirely to the Environment Agency where its assessment was under challenge and where the planning process had the necessary evidence to make its own determination.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2761 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cornwall Waste Forum, St Dennis Branch; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: SITA Cornwall Ltd; Third Defendant: Environment Agency; Fourth Defendant: Cornwall Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town & Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; planning permission quashed
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Appropriate Assessment Under Habitats Directive, Division of Competence Between Planning and Pollution Control Authorities, Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Special Areas of Conservation (sacs)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cornwall Waste Forum, St Dennis Branch
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
SITA Cornwall Ltd
Second Defendant
Environment Agency
Third Defendant
Cornwall Council
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town & Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State, as competent authority, was required to consider and decide if an appropriate assessment under the Habitats Regulations was needed before granting planning permission for an energy-from-waste plant near Special Areas of Conservation; whether a legitimate expectation was created that the inspector would address this issue; whether the inspector was entitled to defer to the Environment Agency's assessment under Regulation 65(2) of the Habitats Regulations.
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector and Secretary of State erred in law by failing to consider and decide, as competent authority, whether an appropriate assessment was required under the Habitats Regulations before granting planning permission, and by failing to address the claimant's challenge to the Environment Agency's assessment. A legitimate expectation was created that this issue would be determined in the planning process, and the failure to do so was unfair. The planning authority could not lawfully defer entirely to the Environment Agency where its assessment was under challenge and where the planning process had the necessary evidence to make its own determination.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; planning permission quashed
Orders
- The decision to grant planning permission is quashed.
- Costs awarded to the claimant, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment