Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd v Far East Chartering Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 1372 (Comm) (05 May 2011)
The claimant shipowners are entitled to enforce the LOI as agents of the charterers under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Delivery occurred within the meaning of the LOI when the cargo was discharged and made available to Binani, including via barges or the port authority. There is no public policy bar to enforcement as the dispute was bona fide and not manifestly unlawful.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1372 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited; First Defendant: Far East Chartering Limited; Second Defendant: Binani Cement Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim (shipping/indemnity) / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim succeeds on primary argument; quantum deferred.
- Legal Topics
- Letter of Indemnity, Third Party Rights, Delivery of Goods, Public Policy in Contracts, Unilateral Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited
Claimant
Far East Chartering Limited
First Defendant
Binani Cement Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (shipping/indemnity) / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant shipowners can enforce a Letter of Indemnity (LOI) issued by cargo receivers under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or as a unilateral contract
- 2 Whether delivery of cargo occurred within the meaning of the LOI
- 3 Whether public policy precludes enforcement of the LOI
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant shipowners are entitled to enforce the LOI as agents of the charterers under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Delivery occurred within the meaning of the LOI when the cargo was discharged and made available to Binani, including via barges or the port authority. There is no public policy bar to enforcement as the dispute was bona fide and not manifestly unlawful.
Court Disposition
Claim succeeds on primary argument; quantum deferred.
Orders
- Parties to make further submissions on quantum and form of order at hand-down.
- Draft order and corrections to be submitted before hand-down.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment